The move--should Montana move to the FBS?

For the tenth year in a row, the Montana Grizzlies football team exited spring practices with the title of “reigning Big Sky Champions.” In August, they’ll resume practices and begin preparing for a season that could hold their fifteenth consecutive playoff appearance. Until Missoula brings another gorgeous autumn and with it, football season, Griz football fans can only talk and speculate. There’s one debate that reigns over all the rest. It’s something every passionate Griz fan has an opinion on: whether or not the Griz have grown too big and too good for this level of competition.

The Montana Grizzlies football team currently plays in the Big Sky Conference of the Football Championship Subdivision, formerly know as Division I-AA. While it is technically considered Division I football, it is not home to college football’s best programs. No, the USCs, Notre Dames and Floridas play in the Football Bowl Subdivision, formerly know as Division I-A. While some numbers may support a move up to the FBS—20 straight regular season wins and a 25,000-seat stadium already sold out for every game next season—financial, competitive and political obstacles loom in the way. 

“We just are not in a position to move up right now,” Athletic Director Jim O’Day said.

Even if the Griz were currently ready to make the jump from the FCS to the FBS, they would not be able to do so. During its August 9, 2007, meeting, the NCAA Division I Board of Directors established a Division I membership moratorium. The moratorium, effective until 2011, prohibits any school from reclassifying to Division I (including reclassifying within Division I from the FBS to the FCS) unless they have already begun the process.

There are currently 20 schools who have already begun the process, with their expected timeframes for a move ranging from one to six years. While only these twenty schools have officially declared themselves as being in the preparation and transition phase, countless other schools are taking a look at making the move.

“So many teams in the Football Championship Subdivision are constantly talking about it,” said O’Day, who will be attending a meeting in June in Dallas where he will discuss the issue with other athletic directors.

So many teams are talking about it, but some take the issue more seriously than others. One mark that a team is seriously looking at moving up: they choose to conduct a feasibility study examining exactly what it would take in terms of money, facilities and competitive ability for a team to move up.

O’Day said the University of Montana isn’t quite ready to conduct a feasibility study of its own, but they do look at studies done by other schools.

“At this point, it’s just not a priority for us, a priority for me,” O’Day said. “Sometimes you kind of wish you had the answers but there’s no reason for us to do anything right now because of our health and where we’re at right now.”

Financially, Montana is one of the “healthiest” football programs in the FCS. When the Griz play Division II Central Washington at home next season, they will net just under $500,000. When they play rival Montana State, the net gain for the University of Montana will be $1 million. The increase comes from higher ticket prices and UM creating a standing room only crowd by selling more tickets than the stadium has seats.

By comparison, the $25,000 the University of Albany netted after traveling out to Missoula in 2007 and getting beat 35-14 was more than they made for a home game.

Because the University of Montana makes so much off its home games, the team doesn’t have to travel to FBS powers and risk injury for payouts that would seem very lucrative to some schools, but are beneath what UM makes for staying at home.

Travel costs are another reason the Griz play so many games at home. These costs could potentially go up if the Griz were to move to the FBS. If the Griz were to play in the Western Athletic Conference—home to former Big Sky teams Boise State, Idaho and Nevada—they would have to travel to the University of Hawaii and Louisiana Tech.

Every time the Griz travel, they are forced to charter their own flight because there isn’t an airline that offers a big enough plane to fly the team and coaching staff out of Missoula. O’Day said the cost of chartering a plane ranges between $60,000 and $100,000.

With so many factors off the field that play into the decision, it’s almost easy to forget what could happen on the field of play. The wide range of issues includes how well UM would compete at a higher level, the type and caliber of player the Griz could recruit and the effect on sports other than football.

“People say ‘Well, what happens if we go 4-7?’” O’Day asked. “I think that would be very realistic.”

The Griz haven’t finished below .500 since they went 3-8 in 1985. That season, they averaged 5,599 fans per home game; that's less than the basketball team averaged for the same year. One has to look no further than UM's men’s hoops program to see what losing does to a fan base, attendance has plummeted 42 percent since the 1991-1992 season.

At the FCS level, Griz fans not only get to see a winning team, but also a large chunk of homegrown talent. Of the 67 kids currently on Montana’s 2008 roster, 52 percent of them are from Montana. By comparison, only 13 percent of the University of Idaho’s current 2008 roster is from Idaho. Some of the best talent in Montana wouldn’t be able to compete on the state’s biggest stage and many fans wouldn’t get to see players they watched excel at the high school level.

Another crop of talent Montana may not be able to get at the FBS level: the “tweeners” who may be good enough to play at the FBS level, but choose to play in the FCS for an increase in playing and a better chance at winning.

Tyler Joyce, a senior linebacker who led the Griz in tackles in 2007, said he had opportunities to play football at Colorado University, Colorado State University and the University of Idaho.

"I chose to go to Montana because, first, I wanted to go somewhere where I felt wanted," Joyce said. "Second, I had the opportunity to play as a true freshman, and I wanted to win."
O'Day reasoned that factors like watching Montana players and the team’s readiness to compete would weigh heavily on the minds of the fans. When guessing what their stance on the issue would be, he said he “bet it favors, at least 10-to-1, to stay where we’re at.” Not quite.

In a poll on eGriz.com, a popular Internet message board for Montana Grizzlies diehards, 53 percent of the 128 people who responded said they would like to see the University of Montana move up to the FBS. It’s worth noting that this only represents the fanatics and not necessarily your average fan. However, they are passionate and opinionated.

“It's not just football for me,” an anonymous commenter said. “I'd like to see our basketball programs get into a higher profile basketball conference so they would have a chance for a 6 or 7 seed [in the NCAA Tournament]. As it is in the Big Sky, we were lucky to get a 12 a few years back and a 14 to 16 is the norm.”

If the Montana football team were to move to another conference, all other sports would be forced to come with. This may be best for revenue sports like football and men’s basketball but there are sports where, competitively, it wouldn’t even matter and may even hurt.

For example, in 2007, the Big Sky Conference actually had a higher RPI (a computerized ranking used to rate how well conferences and teams compare to each other) than the Western Athletic Conference when it came to women’s basketball. In men’s basketball, where the Big Sky is rated far lower than the WAC, the Montana Grizzlies beat conference powers Boise State and Nevada in the 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 seasons respectively.

O’Day said in Olympic sports like soccer, track and field and tennis, “we’re all pretty much on the same level.”

Football, however, is the money sport and there are a lot of obstacles in the way of a move. University President George Dennison would have to approve; then it would go to the Montana Board of Regents. It’s very possible the Board of Regents would turn down any move unless it included Montana State University tagging along. O’Day said he would be “very surprised” if the Board of Regents and State legislature allowed the Griz to move up without the Bobcats. O’Day said he believes the state would like to see the two teams playing in the same conference and division, where their century-old rival would mean more.

In 1996, a similar packaged deal was made with Boise State and the University of Idaho. Boise State has excelled since the move with seven conference championships (two in the Big West and five in the WAC) and a Fiesta Bowl win over Oklahoma. Meanwhile, Idaho has struggled.

“Obviously, we would’ve liked to have been more competitive in our revenue sports,” Idaho Athletic Director Rob Spears said.

Spears pointed to the school’s facilities as one of the reasons for a disappointing beginning in the Football Bowl Subdivision.

“In the past ten years, we didn’t do the things we needed to do to prepare to be in this league,” Spears said. “From 1982 until 2004, this athletic program did not do one facility enhancement. Had they been preparing for success over that twenty year span, it would’ve been a lot easier.”

Appalachian State Athletic Director Charlie Cobb, whose school has won three straight FCS National Championships, said facilities are currently a much higher priority than any potential move to the FBS.
Appalachian State is currently spending $50 million to enhance its facilities, including $35 million on 4,500 new seats for the football stadium and a 125,000 square foot athletic complex adjacent to the stadium.

“If you’re going to write anything,” he said, “say that we haven’t spent more than one second trying to decide whether we’re going to move up in the near foreseeable future.”

He pointed to the moratorium and the schools current budget as reasons to stay in the FCS. Appalachian State currently has an athletic budget of $11 million, about $500,000 less than Montana. Both Cobb and O’Day said their budgets would need to be about $16 million to compete in the FBS.

O’Day said improving athletic facilities is also a goal the University of Montana has focused on.

“Right now, you do your best to get your facilities in place because you can’t be running scared,” he said.

O’Day said facilities like a new locker room, an indoor practice facility, and a new academic center for athletes—all things the athletic department is working on—help draw in the best student-athletes.

Montana and Appalachian State do have some similarities in their hesitance towards moving up and attempts to ready themselves by building facilities but there are major differences.

Appalachian State tries to play one FBS team per year—a scheduling challenge issued to Cobb by head football coach Jerry Moore—and already has one on the schedule for four of the next six seasons, including a sure-to-be-hyped battle of national champions with reigning FBS champ LSU in 2008. Montana does not currently have any scheduled FBS opponents.

Also, Appalachian State currently supports 20 varsity sports, four more than what’s required to compete in an FBS conference. Montana only has 14 varsity sports.

Right now, University of Montana is not in a position to make the move or officially looking to do so. However it is tough to deny that the university and athletic department are doing their best to prepare, whether it’s intentional or not, for a move to the Football Championship Subdivision.

The fans should do so as well, not necessarily by dumping in money, but by savoring what we have now. The Grizzlies are at the top of their division, winning conference titles and competing for national championships every year. The administration is currently content with the football program staying in the Football Championship Subdivision, but eventually, their opinion and other circumstances may change.
“We will continue to improve facilities, build the program and do our best to make UM Athletics the special place it has become—knowing that some day we might have to make a decision that will affect the future of our athletics program and its fans,” O’Day said. 

“Only time will tell.  Stay tuned.”

Appalachian State gets ESPN game under the lights


Appalachian State gets even more love as their November 1st game against Wofford gets pushed back a day so the game can be televised Halloween night on ESPN2.

There are numerous intriguing storylines that make the matchup appealing for ESPN2’s national audience. The contest pits the defending Southern Conference co-champions and is the first between the two teams since Appalachian had its 17-game winning streak snapped by Wofford, 42-31, last Sept. 22 in Spartanburg, S.C. ASU rebounded from the loss to Wofford to go 13-2 en route to its third-straight NCAA Division I national championship, while Wofford (9-4) earned the SoCon’s automatic postseason bid and advanced to the national quarterfinals.

The timing's not great as there will be a decent chunk of people out doing whatever adults or college students do on Halloween, but whatever, it's exposure for the FCS and App State program. Good for them.

So, will something like this ever happen for Montana? One of two things would have to happen: we'd need to get lights. ESPN2 could be interested in a Friday night Cat-Griz game under the lights. It's one of the oldest rivalries in college football and, along with App State, Missoula is one of the best FCS venues in the nation. Otherwise, we have to schedule someone great. An App State, Georgia Southern, what have you. Even then, you probably still have to beat Michigan and win a string of National Championships.

Appalachian State appears in Nike ad, sort of

It's not much but having your logo appear in a Nike ad because your team upset Michigan and won three straight national championships beats the hell out of Monte appearing in a Capital One commercial because a bunch of eGrizzers voted for him.

Damn, I love Nike ads.

It would've been one helluva game

One more game-winner by Dan. One more big stop by our D. One more touchdown instead of a field goal. One of these things and the Montana football team would've been playing this weekend to set up one of the greatest games in the history of Montana football. It would've been a Richmond win away, but imagine one of these...

Appalachian State @ Montana, Dec. 7, 5:30 p.m.
The Montana Grizzlies, arguably the most successful FCS team of the past ten years, face off two-time reigning national champions Appalachian State on friday night in Missoula. In the first round, the Griz beat one of the two teams who beat Appalachian State this year. Did you know the Mountaineers beat Michigan this year? It will be one of the nation's best defenses against the explosive Mountaineer offense. This game almost came to fruition earlier in the season but things fell through. Well, it's happening now, friday night on ESPN2.

Eastern Washington @ Montana, Dec. 8, 12:05 p.m.
After the first match-up, most Eagles fans probably thought they'd have to wait until next year for a much-desired rematch with the vaunted Grizzlies. The Eagles were not intimidated by the Griz D or the noisy crowd as they racked up 565 yards of total offense, 451 coming through the air, and were a 4th and 10 stop away from upsetting the Griz. Now they have their shot. Media outlets across the nation picked on the Big Sky Conference for being weak, now it's two teams from the 'Sky who will face off for a trip to Chattanooga.

Castles in the Big Sky: Week 3

Portland State saves their season with a 35-24 win over Sac State. The Vikings probably went into this game the same way Michigan will go into their conference schedule. PSU will not get great playoff seeding but they can still win the conference and make the playoffs. Unlike the Wolverines, the Viks can still win a National Championship. It's not likely, but as a Cubs fan, I like to think anyone can win once they get in the playoffs.

Montana State kills Dixie State, 61-7. Nice job guys, nice job. Some people mark this as some sort of sign that MSU is fine and will be something of a contender. The win is what it is. If you're proud of a D-II shilacking, that's not good. I'm not saying the Cats will or will not be a factor in the 'Sky but the only message this sends is that they can blow out a team from a lower division. Good to know.

NAU falls to Appalachian State, 34-21. It would've been nice to see a Big Sky team get mentioned on SC for beating the giant-killers from Boone, but it didn't happen as the Mountaineers won their 17th straight game. It could've been worse. If NAU can keep it within two possessions, maybe the Griz can pull off a win.

Weber State blown out by Cal Poly, 47-19. The Weber State secondary allowed Mustangs quarterback Jonathan Dally to rack up Colt Brennan-esque numbers in the loss. The kid tossed 6 TDs on 328 yards.

Northern Colorado loses to San Diego, 49-13. This type of score was expected with the Bears coming off a huge loss to D-II Chadron State. On a positive note, they did find a running back. David Woods finished with 180 all-purpose yards.

Eastern beats UC Davis, 41-31. It wasn't Bengals-Browns but the Eagles and Aggies combined for almost 1,000 total yards. The Aggies had more yards and the Eagles had more points.

Idaho State trounced by Oregon State, 61-10. You know the deal. Big Sky team plays FBS opponent, Big Sky team loses by 30+ while the FBS team puts up huge numbers. Whatever pays the bills.

Could Montana play with Appalachian State?


No. As a Griz and Fighting Irish fan, I'm sorry to say the game would end up looking like the one above with the Griz as ND and App St as LSU.

Appalachian is just too fast. Montana's weakest spot, currently the secondary, would have a tough time hanging with the Mountaineers fast skill players. However, the Griz could make it a game if the Lex and the offensive line played out of their minds. Even then, it'd still be a tough matchup.

Five questions with Appalachian State AD Charlie Cobb

Appalachian State's win over Michigan has been called the greatest upset in the history of college football. Now here's one of the people who helped put it together: Appalachian State athletic director Charlie Cobb.

Grizzoulian: What do you believe this win does for your program? What do you hope it does for your program? More attention, more recruits, more donations?

Charlie Cobb: Exposure is obviously tremendous. Our hope is that it gives some national credit to Coach Moore, his staff, and the players.

Grizzoulian: What affect does this win have on the FCS as a whole? Does it give the whole division a bit more legitimacy?

Charlie Cobb: I think it shows that you still have to play the games. My favorite picture from the game Saturday - besides the scoreboard shots - is the one from the coin toss to start the game. Their left tackle is 6'7" and 320. Our guys don't even hit his chest, yet somehow we stayed in the game. As for a lasting legacy, I think it's going to take more wins by the better programs over FBS schools to start any kind of national movement. The scary part is how many of these schools are going to get a chance.

Grizzoulian: Did you schedule this game? If so, what were your thoughts when you set it up? What was the amount paid to the Mountaineer program for making the trip to Ann Arbor?

Charlie Cobb: We were paid $400,000 for the game.  I've told many people that we didn't play the game for money.  Coach likes the challenge of playing FBS schools.  I don't ever want to be the kind of administrator that puts his program out for bid because I think it cheapens the whole deal.  We needed games and Michigan was still looking for a 12th game and we were able to make it happen. Jay Sutton, our Associate Athletic Director, deserves all the credit for getting the game done on our end.

Grizzoulian: The University of Montana and Appalachian State almost had a game set up, why did that fall through? Do you think games like that are essential for the progression of the FCS?

Charlie Cobb: We talked with Montana about a game and still have interest in playing. Travel and expenses really seem to be the biggest hurdle. These types of games are what make our season interesting. Unfortunately, both of us seem to be at the end of the spectrum in terms of getting other FCS schools to play.

Grizzoulian: Is Appalachian State taking a potential move to the FBS into consideration at all? Does this win make you consider it a bit more?

Charlie Cobb: Let's enjoy the win and not make it a one-game referendum on going to the FBS. We want our entire athletic program to mirror our university in being the best that we can be. Our Chancellor, Dr. Ken Peacock, wants Appalachian to be the very best - academically, athletically, and in the arts. That's our goal.

Congrats to Appalachian State


The image above is currently being displayed on the front page of ESPN.com.

Congratulations to the Mountaineers. It's not often you applaud the efforts of a rival, but this is one case where it's warranted. The win not only reflects well on the Appalachian State program, but also lends a sense of legitimacy to the entire Football Championship Subdivision.

Appalachian State getting some added attention

The Appalachian State Mountaineers, who are coming off back-to-back FCS National Championships and will face Michigan in their open, will be getting some extra TV exposure prior to the game against the Wolverines.

News comes from What's hAPPening!, an Appalachian State alumni blog, that the Mountaineers will be featured as part of Fox Sports Net's Under the Lights series. The show reminds me of MTV's Two-A-Days.

FSN camera crews will shadow the Mountaineers throughout much of the month of August, beginning with players reporting to campus, through the team’s first practices of the season, media day, Fan Fest and the dog days of summer camp and concluding with the Apps’ season-opening trip to the 107,051-seat Big House in Ann Arbor, Mich.

I normally think shows like these are unentertaining and a potential distraction to their subject but in this case I welcome the exposure. The more TV time for the FCS, the better. Now let's hope the Mountaineers can at least put a scare into the National Championship contending Wolverines.

AGS announces 2007 FCS Preseason Poll

Any Given Saturday released its preseason poll and after the offseason, Appalachian State still sits at the #1 spot. They've lost a lot of starters but you're the best until somebody beats you. The Griz come in second having gathered 16 first-place votes.

Here is the complete poll:

Any Given Saturday Poll Preseason Top 25
(First place votes in parenthesis)
1. Appalachian State (97)
2. Montana (16)
3. North Dakota State
4. Youngstown State
5. Massachusetts (1)
6. Northern Iowa (1)
7. New Hampshire
8. James Madison
9. Furman
10. Cal Poly
11. Illinois State
12. McNeese State
13. Southern Illinois
14. Portland State
15. Hampton
16. Wofford
17. Tennessee-Martin
18. Delaware
19. Eastern Illinois
20. Sam Houston State
21. Montana State
22. South Dakota State
23. Lehigh
24. Coastal Carolina
25. Yale

Others receiving votes (minimum of 5 votes): Towson (61), UC Davis (59), Lafayette (40), Princeton (39), Maine (33), Harvard (26), San Diego (26), South Carolina State (22), Georgia Southern (17), Eastern Kentucky (14), Northern Arizona (14), Richmond (12), Central Arkansas (10), Liberty (10), Northwestern State (8), Western Illinois (8), Delaware State (7), Northeastern (7), Albany (6), Colgate (6), Texas State (6), The Citadel (6), Alabama A&M (5), Jacksonville State (5).

BIGGEST RISING TEAM FROM 2006: Northern Iowa, Wofford (tie)
BIGGEST FALLING TEAM FROM 2006: Montana State

It's really a shame that App. State/UM game never came together. An early season, 1 vs 2 Ohio State/Texas-esque game would've been great and who knows, maybe it would've gotten some TV exposure.

NAU snatches up App. St game

It is now official: Northern Arizona will play defending FCS National Champion Appalachian State on September 15. It was rumored that the Griz were interested in such a match-up but it never really panned out as the logistics didn't work for either school.

For those of you wondering why the Griz has such an awful schedule this year and why UM is not playing the Mountaineers, I point to a previous entry containing an email with UM AD Jim O'Day.

Here's a brief excerpt with O'Day's words on Appalachian State. For other information, read the complete email.

Would love to play App State, but the cost may be too high for both schools. Trouble flying in and out of Boone and Missoula. We both estimate about $125,000… which most likely won’t be doable for either this year as we try to pay our bills. The cost of travel to some of these “remote” places is making scheduling more and more challenging and difficult. Everyone has to pay their bills, and wants some money in return for making the trip. Boise is paying in the neighborhood of $185,000 for a guarantee game, and we’re already at $125,000 being offered… with few takers. They say it would cost almost that much just to fly into Missoula and pay accompanying bills.

It's really disappointing that even though we have some of the best attendance in all of the FCS, money was a deciding factor in whether or not this match-up occurred. It's kind of frustrating when you remember that—I believe this is true, comment if I'm wrong— the trip to Flagstaff is about as difficult as it gets.

O'Day: Money may be too great an obstacle for game between Appalachian St and UM

I mentioned earlier in the week that there was a strong possibility that Appalachian State, back-to back FCS National Champions, would be coming to Missoula during the 2007 season. I exchanged emails with AD Jim O'Day earlier today and it looks like the matchup is unlikely for a wide variety of reasons.

I have only skimmed his response and wanted to get it up as soon as possible before doing any real analysis or stating my opinion.

His email, in its entirety, is after the jump.


-----------------------------

Would love to play App State, but the cost may be too high for both schools. Trouble flying in and out of Boone and Missoula. We both estimate about $125,000… which most likely won’t be doable for either this year as we try to pay our bills. The cost of travel to some of these “remote” places is making scheduling more and more challenging and difficult. Everyone has to pay their bills, and wants some money in return for making the trip. Boise is paying in the neighborhood of $185,000 for a guarantee game, and we’re already at $125,000 being offered… with few takers. They say it would cost almost that much just to fly into Missoula and pay accompanying bills.

Because of our deficit, we were forced the past four years to buy out “return trips” to Hofstra, Cal Poly and South Dakota State (plus two more home games vs. Central Washington) – which hasn’t made UM very popular- and the word spreads. However, you have to do what you have to do to keep the program up and running. First Wayne Hogan had to make that decision, then Don Read, and now, me. By getting out of the deficit this year – and having more funding from the payoff of the north end zone and new stadium suite leases (first time in 20 years), we will see some light at the end of the tunnel. Fiscal Year 2007-08, however, is all about funding. Without the Griz-Cat game in Missoula (we net about $500,000 from that game) and a Division I guarantee (we netted about $500,000 from the Iowa game), we find ourselves battling a funding imbalance next year. In addition, by paying off the debt, we will no longer receive the $4/student football ticketing fee, nor much of the deficit elimination money (Collegiate Licensing, concessions, license plates, Coke contract), which will be significantly reduced, plus rent and other expenses are expected to increase by about $100,000. Thus, expenses will be increased somewhat, and revenues will be decreased. The difference is about a $500,000-$600,000 nut that we are facing…. And working through. It will, however, prevent us from paying a larger guarantee to someone wanting to come to Missoula this year…. Thus the reasons why we probably can’t provide someone like Appalachian State with enough to get here and still allow them to make money.

A lot of the top tier Football Championship Subdivision schools are having similar scheduling problems. Home games mean a lot to them, and thus, they are having to pay out guarantees or work out other funding options. At last count, App had two games still to schedule, Cal Poly had three (and needs all at home, plus they’re offering a guarantee of $90,000) and North Dakota State had four. It’s also harder for those of us in the Western United States because of the few I-AA opponents out here. Others are willing to play, but want us to go there first because of past history. At this point, I have two options: Find a I-AA to come to Missoula for an acceptable price, or play a I-A guarantee on the road – leaving us with six home games. There are very few Division I guarantees out there willing to talk to us. Most are scheduled through 2011 (last year was an exception because the 12th game ruling didn’t come down until January so they were all scrambling to find another game --- and a home game to those schools means significant dollars…. Iowa probably netted around $2.5 million playing the Griz). Except for the larger schools, most I-A guarantees range in the neighborhood of $150,000-$250,000… and we currently net about $300,000 for a home football game, depending on the guarantee we might have to pay out. Some of the Division I schools are also very particular as to whom they are willing to play… who wants to be the next Colorado or New Mexico to lose to a talented I-AA school at home? Disaster! Minnesota almost did the same last year with North Dakota State before escaping with a 10-9 win when NDSU had a short field goal blocked late in the game. Instead, they’d rather play a guaranteed win for a smaller fee… thus, making larger profits. We all look at “net” to the program, thus meaning those who are able to fly out of and into large metropolitan areas (even to the extent of Spokane, Portland and Salt Lake), as well as those where you can bus (most East Coast teams, plus Northern Arizona – Phoenix or Tucson) don’t need as much guarantee to make it work. This is different for Montana and Montana State, where expenses to fly in and out of this state are extremely high.

Economically, we have to be very sensitive to decisions made in the past that backfired. We have many people watching our financial situation very closely --- all the way up to the Regent level. We can not get out of hand as in the past when we made very expensive (and money-losing) trips to Hawaii, Hofstra and Maine --- and didn’t have the revenue streams to offset these high travel expenses. Down the road, we should be in much better position to do so. That being said, we are looking at some good home-and-home games with I-AA opponents, and most likely will have to get into some type of guarantee for our final game this year – which limits teams willing to come to Missoula.

It gets more and more challenging and complicating by the year… but we all learn a lot…. Especially from some schools whose coaches definitely do not want to see Montana on their schedule – both at the I-A and I-AA level. Scheduling is also becoming tougher and tougher for men’s and women’s basketball for the Griz teams as Robin Selvig and Wayne Tinkle will attest. It’s a new era.

Appalachian State coming to the Zoo?

Once again, I don't have a link to the article because their site isn't updated, but the Kaimin is reporting the potential for a matchup in Missoula against Appalachian State.

According to the paper, the reigning I-AA National Champions are really pushing to be the ones who get to fill the void on UM's schedule.

"Appalachian State is pushing harder than anyone," O'Day said. "They're even willing to come here and play."

"They're not afraid to play anybody," O'Day said. "But you also look at it and say, are we ready to play them? I know the fans would love it, but I'm not so sure the coaches would."

As a fan, I would love it but I am afraid of what could happen if things did go wrong. This game, I believe, would be early in the season and a poor showing could hurt their confidence going into conference play. A bad loss against one of I-AA elite could also serve as a measuring stick once it came time for seeding the playoffs.

Even so, you need to have faith in your program and your fans. Trust that WaGriz will be louder than ever and the players will probably be as up for this game as they would be for Griz-Cat. A win over the back to back national champions would give the players and fans a huge boost.

Griz one game away from I-AA National Championship Game

With their victory over the Southern Illinois Salukis, the Griz have moved within one win of a trip to Chattanooga Tennessee for the I-AA National Championship Game. This kind of blows my mind: the Superbowl is in Miami, the BCS title game is in Glendale, Arizona and the I-AA National Championship Game is somewhere in Tennessee. That seems unfair.

This game will be played Friday night at  5:30 against the University of Massachusetts Minutemen. The game will be telecast live on ESPN as they'll bring in portable lights for the game. This comes after Appalachian State, who stomped Ms. U, chose to play their game Saturday afternoon. Sure it may feel like Lambeau, in January, on Pluto, but I'll take the atmosphere a night in the Zoo brings.

Time for another "maroon-out?"

We're talking about playoffs -- Griz get #2 seed in I-AA bracket.

As long as the Griz keep winning, they will be at home all the way until they travel to Chattanooga for the I-AA National Championship.

The Griz earned the #2 seed and will face McNeese State University, who earned the automatic bid from the from the Southland Conference.

Next Saturday's Griz/Cowboys game won't be the only one played in Montana. The Bobcats will be playing host to the Furman Paladins. That is one of the weirdest sports names I've ever heard. After doing a Google image search I think a Paladin is a World of Warcraft character. Nice.

The #1 seed is first-ranked and defending champion Appalachian State.

Check out the press release on nccasports.com for more information on the playoffs; I'll try to get a bracket up once I figure out the complete seedings